High court: Prisons can withhold newspapers

updated 11:00 a.m. ET June 28, 2006

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that Pennsylvania officials did not violate the free-speech rights of troublesome inmates by keeping secular newspapers and magazines away from them.

Justices, by a 6-3 vote, said the state could use newspapers as incentives to get inmates in a high-security unit to behave themselves.

But Justice Stephen Breyer wrote that Pennsylvania’s win could be short-lived, depending on whether there is another constitutional challenge to the high-security unit’s rules.

The decision reverses a ruling by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals but validates a dissent by the high court’s newest member, Justice Samuel Alito, who sided with Pennsylvania when he served on the appellate court. Alito did not participate in the argument before the Supreme Court.

Breyer said that “prison officials, relying on their professional judgment, reached an experience-based conclusion that the policies help to further legitimate prison objectives.”

MORE FROM CRIME & COURTS

Crime & courts Section Front

Fort Hood suspect charged with murder Parents of ‘balloon boy’ to plead guilty Dad, sons in sex-abuse case appear in court Man charged with kidnapping missing girl Doctors questioned Hasan's behavior Dog trainer killed by ex-wife's beau? Stench returns to area of Ohio killings Jury convicts Ark. man in death of TV anchorwoman Crime & courts Section Front   Add Crime & courts headlines to your news reader: