Skip navigation
sponsored by 

Transcript for June 4


< Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

MR. HARWOOD: Well, White House officials say that when you really look at what he said as opposed to groups he’s associated with say, he’s not far out of step with the president on this. I think the significance could be when we get to the last two years of the Bush presidency, is there something like a carbon tax, for example, that might be used in the context of tax reform and deficit reduction? We don’t know what effect he’s going to have. Right now, what they really care about from Hank Paulson is somebody who has credibility with the markets, who can sort of keep smooth sailing between now and the election.

MS. IFILL: I’m certain that Hank Paulson has—feels he’s figured this all out and has gotten the guarantees he needs, but the question that has to be asked in the next two and a half years for any secretary of treasury is what it is that Henry Paulson can accomplish that Paul O’Neill couldn’t accomplish and that John Snow couldn’t accomplish? Is he going to be listened to? Does he have points of view which are actually going to change it? Or is it just important just to have someone in that chair who carries with him the credibility of Wall Street and therefore, silences some of the discontent of the critics and some of the nervousness, perhaps, about the Fed chairman as well.

MR. RUSSERT: Before we go, looking to November of ‘06, what is your reporting telling you? How are the parties feeling?

MR. HARWOOD: Well, there’s a lot of pessimism within the Republican Party. This Republican pollster I talked to on Friday said, “If the election were held today, we would lose the House.” That’s probably what’s going to happen. It’ll be fascinating to see how they handle this immigration bill, the House-Senate conference. Many of the House conservatives want to come out with a border security-only bill. They think that’s what their base wants.

MS. IFILL: Someone asked me the other day whether the Democrats were—if Republicans are as panicked this time as the Democrats were in 1994. And as I recall, Tim, the Democrats weren’t panicked because they didn’t see it coming. This time they see it coming and so that’s where you get the...

MR. HARWOOD: It’s a big difference.

MS. IFILL: That’s where you hear the panic coming from.

MR. RUSSERT: Is there time to adjust?

MS. IFILL: Sure.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement

MR. HARWOOD: There’s time to adjust and there’s also time to raise money. Remember, the Democrats—the Republican National Committee has more money than Howard Dean and the Democratic National Committee do.

MR. RUSSERT: John Harwood, Gwen Ifill, thanks a lot.

MS. IFILL: Thank you.

MR. RUSSERT: We’ll be right back.

(Announcements)

MR. RUSSERT: That’s all for today. We’ll be back next week at a special earlier time, 8 a.m. Eastern, right before the French Open tennis finals. Check out our Web site during the week for air times in your area mtp.msnbc.com.

If it’s Sunday, it’s MEET THE PRESS. Thank you, Buffalo Sabres, for a great year.



< Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

Sponsored links

Resource guide

Get Your 2008 Credit Score

Save Money On Car Insurance

Find a business to start

Movies delivered - Try free

Search Jobs

Find Your Dream Home

$7 trades, no fee IRAs

Find your next car