Enron prosecutors painted as puppet masters

updated 6:53 p.m. ET May 16, 2006

HOUSTON - At times Tuesday, it almost seemed easy to forget who was on trial — the one-time corporate chieftains Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling or the federal government’s own Enron Task Force.

As lawyers for Lay and Skilling laid out their closing arguments in the former Enron Corp. chief executives’ fraud trial, they shifted the focus squarely to prosecutors, painting them as bent on convicting the pair when they did nothing wrong.

In the day’s waning minutes in court, one of Lay’s lawyers even motioned to John Hueston, a task force prosecutor normally based in Los Angeles, and boomed: “Don’t come to Houston, Texas, and lie to us.”

The remark drew brief applause from Skilling and from members of Lay’s family watching in the courtroom.

Skewering the Enron Task Force was the theme of the day in six hours of defense arguments. Skilling lawyer Daniel Petrocelli suggested prosecutors had described Enron executives as “lieutenants” to raise a comparison between Enron and the Mafia.

As for the case against Skilling and Lay, Petrocelli said: “This was all manufactured after the fact. Because it’s Enron. After all, somebody has to pay. It’s Enron.”

Petrocelli portrayed the prosecutors as puppet masters, accusing them of seeking to win convictions by criminalizing innocent comments, honest mistakes and normal business practices.

“They had their eye on the prize. The prize was Jeff Skilling and Ken Lay, and that’s why we’re here,” Petrocelli said. “Documents don’t lie. People do. So you create evidence.”

The defense has contended all along that it was not a massive fraud that sank Enron in 2001 — rather that it was a lethal mix of negative press, lesser crimes by Enron Chief Financial Officer Andrew Fastow, short-sellers and the post-Sept. 11 bear market.

Prosecutors say Lay, the Enron founder, and Skilling, who served as CEO for six months in 2001, lied to investors and employees by touting Enron’s financial health when they knew accounting trickery hid failing ventures.

The government will have about two hours Wednesday morning to make their final argument to the eight-woman, four-man jury, and then jurors will begin deliberations. Lay and Skilling could face decades in prison if they are convicted.

Defense lawyers appeared to be pinning their hopes on Tuesday on shattering the credibility of the eight former Enron executives who pleaded guilty and testified for the government against Lay and Skilling — or at least raising doubt in jurors’ minds.

Petrocelli said the former executives were “robbed of their free will” by the task force, and pleaded guilty to crimes they did not commit out of fear of lengthy prison terms and expensive legal battles.

Lay lawyer George Secrest sounded the same theme, calling the government cooperators “radioactive” and insisting they could not be relied on for the “unvarnished truth.”

MORE FROM ENRON TRIAL

Enron Trial Section Front

Ex-Enron exec gets 27-month sentence Ex-Enron exec sentenced to 2 years Lay's widow asks judge to stop seizure of condo Judge: No class action in Enron suit Judge: Enron investor suit can proceed Ex-Enron exec Causey reports to prison Ex-Enron CEO Skilling reports to prison Skilling’s jail: good food, no window bars Skilling denied bail during appeals process Two ex-Enron execs get reduced sentences Enron Trial Section Front   Add Enron Trial headlines to your news reader: