Senate forces align with Bush on immigration

Anger among Republicans
Reaction to the president's Monday speech was generally positive toward the border enforcement initiative, but noncommittal at best on the citizenship question.

Many conservatives were angry. Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga., said the National Guard proposal “must not be coupled with a thinly veiled attempt to grant amnesty,” which is what conservatives consider Bush's proposal for a guest worker program.

A GOP aide, speaking on condition of anonymity, told NBC News that the Guard initiative was like "the shiny piece of metal on the spinner lure," and said the president has "no credibility" on this issue with conservatives.

House Majority Leader John Boehner praised the Guard proposal as a "good first step" toward border enforcement but expressed concerns about the guest worker plan.

In October, 81 House conservatives wrote Bush and insisted that any guest worker program come after passage of a border enforcement bill. Following protests across the nation by tens of thousand of immigrants and their supporters, positions have only hardened on that score.

‘Turbochargers’ on
As Bush drew continued criticism from House Republicans, the White House sought to emphasize the border security elements of the president’s plan.

At a news conference Tuesday, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and other administration officials focused on Bush’s authorization of up to 6,000 National Guard troops to states along the border with Mexico.

“This is going to be a tremendous enforcement support partnership,” U.S. Border Patrol Chief David Aguilar told reporters at the White House.

Chertoff described the proposals as “turbochargers” that would help solve an issue “that has plagued this country for over 20 years.”

The officials stressed that National Guard forces would function in support roles, leaving front-line law enforcement against illegal immigrants in the hands of federal Border Patrol agents.

Speech highlights
The centerpiece of Bush’s speech Monday night from the Oval office was his announcement that as many as 6,000 National Guard troops would be dispatched, in coordination with governors, to states along the Mexican border to provide intelligence and surveillance support to Border Patrol agents. The Border Patrol would remain responsible for catching and detaining illegal immigrants.

“We do not yet have full control of the border, and I am determined to change that,” the president said.

MSNBC.COM ON THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE National Guard likely to play support role Immigration costs, benefits hard to nail down Live Vote: Should we use troops on border? Bush ordering National Guard to U.S. border A tale of two fences Report: U.S. Border Patrol demoralized Bush seeks $1.9 billion for border security NBC's David Gregory interviews Bush

Still, Bush insisted, “The United States is not going to militarize the southern border.”

While much of the advance focus on Bush’s speech was on border security, the president’s comments on possible citizenship for illegal immigrants were more explicit than earlier remarks and showed an effort to appeal to moderates and business owners who favor liberalized immigration laws.

“Some in this country argue that the solution is to deport every illegal immigrant, and that any proposal short of this amounts to amnesty. I disagree,” he said.

“It is neither wise nor realistic to round up millions of people, many with deep roots in the United States, and send them across the border. There is a rational middle ground between granting an automatic path to citizenship for every illegal immigrant, and a program of mass deportation.”

Two-week rotations
The Guard troops would mostly serve two-week stints before rotating out of the assignment, so keeping the force level at 6,000 over the course of a year could require up to 156,000 troops.

Republicans were unified in applauding that portion of the president’s speech. So, too, were Democrats, in a more limited way.

“Democrats are willing to support any reasonable plan that will secure our borders, including deploying National Guard troops,” said Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill. “But Americans don’t want a plan that’s been cobbled together to win political favor.”

MORE FROM SECURITY

Security Section Front

Investigators: Fort Hood suspect acted alone Profile of Fort Hood suspect emerges Cheney blasts probe of CIA interrogations Men held after 9/11 get $1.26 million Appeals court: Detained Canadian cannot sue the US Agencies: Glitch with foreign SS numbers is fixed Security Section Front   Add Security headlines to your news reader: