Port security rules could cost jobs, officials say

updated 2:47 p.m. ET April 21, 2006

LOS ANGELES - Cargo industry officials are worried that a federal ID system aimed at boosting security could cost many port workers their jobs, something that would bottle up the flow of goods destined for virtually every U.S. community.

Details of the program — more than three years in the making — are still being worked out. But according to industry officials who have discussed it with the Transportation Security Administration and Coast Guard, illegal immigrants and people convicted of certain crimes might be barred from the positions they now hold.

At ports, that could mean thousands of people will be out of jobs, including dock workers and truck drivers.

“Of course there are concerns,” said Chuck Carroll, executive director of the National Association of Waterfront Employers, a trade group for terminal operators. “You’d have the same number of boxes but fewer people to move them, and that could mean major congestion.”

Steve Stallone, spokesman for the International Longshore and Warehouse Union, said a conviction shouldn’t automatically preclude someone from working.

“Just because a guy got into a bar fight does not make him a terrorist,” said Stallone, whose union represents nearly 14,000 West Coast longshoremen and clerks. “Terrorist acts are one thing. But that you beat up your next-door neighbor? I don’t think so.”

Up to 6 million people could be impacted
The issue in question is the Transportation Worker Identification Credential program, a post-Sept. 11 security measure that seeks to better control access to harbors, rail yards, airports and other cargo transit areas terrorists might target. It could affect as many as 6 million people.

TSA and Coast Guard officials have refused to discuss details of the plan before it is unveiled, which could be as early as next week.

“We are the first to admit that we need to finish the job,” the agency said in a statement. “This is an initiative that has languished for too long.”

Since the Sept. 11 attacks the federal government has spent many billions of dollars increasing airport security but less has been done at ports. Only a small percentage of cargo is inspected and many workers undergo little or no scrutiny for possible criminal records.

Port security is a sensitive area. Earlier this year, the Bush administration was forced to scrap plans to allow a Dubai-based company to assume oversight at major U.S. harbors after critics in both major political parties voiced strong opposition.

“The openness of our ports ... is one of the tremendous marks of success in this global economy, but it also provides an opportunity for terror,” said Rep. Dan Lungren, R-Calif., who is sponsoring port security legislation with Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif. “We ought to limit (access) to people who are here legally. We ought to limit it to people who would not jeopardize that security.”

MORE FROM SECURITY

Security Section Front

Calls grow for probe of CIA al-Qaida program NYT: Cheney linked to hiding of CIA project Newsweek: Will YouTube be big mistake for Google? Ex-CIA boss: Congress knew of surveillance Lawmaker: Panetta terminated secret program Security Section Front   Add Security headlines to your news reader: