Skip navigation
advertisement

Group OKs lifting Yellowstone grizzly safety net

Wildlife Society takes stand after 250 experts voiced disapproval

Video: Environment  
Thomas Friedman on Copenhagen
Dec. 21: Rachel Maddow is joined by New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, fresh from attending the climate change conference in Copenhagen for a discussion of whether anything of substance was achieved at the conference.

Text alerts on msnbc.com

Breaking news alerts (about 1 per day)
Click here to sign up or text NEWS to MSNBC (67622).

Find more alerts at alerts.msnbc.com

updated 10:41 a.m. ET March 23, 2006

BILLINGS, Montana - A leading organization of wildlife scientists on Wednesday announced its support for lifting Endangered Species Act protections for grizzly bears in the greater Yellowstone area.

The Wildlife Society joins the National Wildlife Federation, which had earlier voiced support for the plan.

But the plan is opposed by more than 250 scientists and researchers who sent a letter Monday to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to oppose "delisting" the bears.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

"This is to make sure that the public understands there is a debate within the scientific community. And many scientists and biologists are very much behind delisting because we really have achieved a success for bears in Yellowstone," Tom France, director of the National Wildlife Federation's Northern Rockies office, said in an interview.

"We're just trying to balance the record," he added.

In a position statement The Wildlife Society said that steps taken by state and federal agencies, such as the development of an overarching conservation strategy, "represent an acceptable framework" for regulation and management post-delisting.

The Wildlife Society represents 7,000 to 8,000 wildlife biologists, the group's executive director, Michael Hutchins, said. There were not sharp divisions among the group over whether to support delisting, he said. Scientists' concerns were incorporated into the development of the position statement, and all members had an opportunity to review and comment on it before it was finalized and approved, he said.

The statement of support followed a "very detailed review" of the government delisting plan, Hutchins said. It includes several caveats, including urging involved agencies to fully implement the conservation strategy and encouraging the Fish and Wildlife Service to place renewed attention on other grizzly recovery areas in the country.

Monday marked the end of a public comment period on a Fish and Wildlife Service proposal to delist Yellowstone-area grizzlies. The agency in November said the population had grown at a rate of 4 percent to 7 percent a year since the mid-1990s, was estimated at more than 600 animals and considered recovered.

More than 250 scientists and researchers signed onto a letter, dated Monday, that said a proposal was premature. They argued, among other things, that there are inadequate habitat protections and too few bears to merit removing federal protections.

Names included on the letter were Jane Goodall and bear researchers John Craighead Sr. and Chuck Jonkel.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Sponsored LinksGet listed here
Online College Courses
Boost your career with an online Degree. Pick from Leading Colleges!
www.EarnMyDegree.com

Sponsored links

Resource guide