Terrorism victims seek redress from museums

Michael E. Ross Reporter • Profile • E-mail

In two lawsuits with implications for museum collections across the nation, a group of Americans is suing Iran, hoping to seize antiquities to satisfy a judgment against Tehran for allegedly sponsoring a deadly terrorist attack.

On Wednesday a judge in U.S. District Court in Chicago extended the period of oversight on museums that have custody of Iranian historical artifacts. In early April, the judge will rule on whether the Americans are entitled to take the artifacts as compensation for the injuries they suffered in a bomb blast in Israel in 1997.

It's the latest chapter in a drama pitting Americans against a foreign country — as well as their own government. The case has also put the spotlight on the controversial origins of some priceless collections in American museums.

Deadly 1997 bombing
On Sept. 4, 1997, three bombs packed with nails, screws and glass ripped through a pedestrian mall in Jerusalem, killing five people and injuring nearly 200 others. The militant Palestinian group Hamas claimed responsibility for the suicide bombings.

Eight Americans who were “severely and permanently injured” in the carnage filed two suits, Diana Campuzano v. the Islamic Republic of Iran et al, and Jenny Rubin et al. v. the Islamic Republic of Iran, et al. Their target was Iran because it is widely believed to fund Hamas.

Represented by Rhode Island attorney David J. Strachman, the victims sued the Iranian government and three top Iranian officials in federal court.

When none of the defendants appeared, the Americans won a default judgment in September 2003. Ruling that Hamas “has a close relationship with Iran,” and that the bombing “would not have occurred without Iranian sponsorship,” U.S. District Judge Ricardo M. Urbina ordered Iran to pay $423.5 million in damages to the eight plaintiffs.

Realizing it would be impossible to collect from the Iranian government, Strachman set his sights on Iranian antiquities, arguing that museums illegally removed historical artifacts from sites in Iran during the 1930s, making them a legitimate form of compensation for his clients.

Targeting antiquities
Since then Strachman has been pursuing artifacts from several institutions, including the University of Chicago; the University of Michigan; the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston, which has an ancient Near Eastern collection with artifacts from Iran, Iraq and other points in the Middle East; and the Detroit Institute of Arts, which has an Islamic art collection dating from the 1100's.

Despite the court victory, the plaintiffs still face another hurdle: the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976, which has provisions for excluding some foreign property from seizure. The federal government says museum collections fall into that category.

In 1996 Congress amended the law to permit suits against countries considered sponsors of terrorism, including Iran. The American hostages released by Iran after the 1979 hostage crisis sued and won a judgment in 2001.

But the Bush administration decided the suit violated the Algiers Accords, the January 1981 agreement that secured the hostages' release after 444 days in captivity, and under which the United States pledges “not to intervene directly or indirectly, politically or militarily in Iran's internal affairs.”

MORE FROM LIFE

Life Section Front

Governor: Philadelphia transit strike ends Late-season hurricane takes aim at U.S. Utah girl’s pierced nose brings suspension Jobless: 10 percent is tougher than it used to be Cavern could collapse, taking part of city Gay marriage opponents win with kid card Life Section Front   Add Life headlines to your news reader: