California postpones execution indefinitely
Ethical concerns led to anesthesiologists’ refusal to participate
![]() Calif. Dept. Of Corrections / AP | Michael Morales, 46, of Stockton, is seen in this undated photo released by the California Department of Corrections, which digitally altered the image. |
NBC VIDEO |
Execution case has national implications Feb. 22: A California death row case questioning whether lethal injection is cruel and unusual punishment could have nationwide implications. NBC's George Lewis reports. Nightly News |
Video: Crime & courts |
Sheriff's dept.: 'The suspect may be hurt' Nov. 29: Pierce County, Wash,, sheriff's spokesman Ed Troyer, says one of the four officers that was shot and killed by a gunman apparently struggled with the suspect, getting off a few shots. Watch his news conference. |
![]() |
Breaking news alerts (about 1 per day) |
Find more alerts at alerts.msnbc.com |
SAN FRANCISCO - State officials on Tuesday postponed indefinitely the execution of a condemned killer, saying they could not comply with a judge’s order that a medical professional administer the lethal injection.
Prison authorities called off the execution after failing to find a doctor, nurse, or other person licensed to inject medications to give a fatal dose of barbiturate, said Vernell Crittendon, a spokesman for San Quentin State Prison.
“We are unable to have a licensed medical professional come forward to inject the medication intravenously, causing the life to end,” he said.
It was unclear when the execution would be carried out, but the delay could last for months because of legal questions surrounding California’s method of lethal injection.
The 24-hour death warrant for Michael Morales was to expire at 11:59 p.m. Tuesday. After that, state officials have to go back to the trial judge who imposed the death sentence in 1983 for another warrant.
Morales, 46, was supposed to die by lethal injection at 12:01 a.m. But the execution was put off until at least Tuesday night after two anesthesiologists backed out because of ethical concerns that they might have to advise the executioner if the inmate woke up or appeared to suffer pain.
“Any such intervention would clearly be medically unethical,” the doctors, whose identities were not released, said in a statement. “As a result, we have withdrawn from participation in this current process.”
The doctors had been brought in by a federal judge after Morales’ attorneys argued that the three-part lethal injection process violates the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. The attorneys said a prisoner could feel excruciating pain from the last two chemicals if he were not fully sedated.
U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel gave prison officials a choice last week: bring in doctors to ensure Morales was properly anesthetized, or skip the usual paralyzing and heart-stopping drugs and execute him with an overdose of a sedative. The latter method is not used any other state.
Prison officials had planned to press forward with the execution Tuesday night using the second option. The judge approved that decision, but said the sedative must be administered in the execution chamber by a person who is licensed by the state to inject medications intravenously. That group would include doctors, nurses and other medical technicians.
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM CRIME & COURTS |
| Add Crime & courts headlines to your news reader: |
Boost your career with an online Degree. Pick from Leading Colleges!
www.EarnMyDegree.com
Sponsored links
Resource guide




