And the character actors shall lead
Slide show |
Slide show |
Walking the Oscar red carpet It’s all sparkle and flash as Hollywood dons its fanciest fashions for the Academy Awards. |
Most popular |
| |||||
The pleasant surprise
Terrence Howard was the best news on nomination day. Before the noms I’d heard idiotic talk that the Academy wasn’t going to vote for black actors this year because black actors had been “too honored” recently. Thankfully it turned out to be just that — idiotic talk.
![]() |
Crunk Pictures / Reuters |
But how does this historical negativity apply to DJay? You can just as easily find fault with Bowling’s wishes as with the Academy’s reality. Cameron is a neutered man who stands by helplessly as his wife is felt up by the cops, while DJay is a strong man who takes his last best shot to do something good with his life. Which image is more positive? Cameron is a small character in a “race” movie while DJay is the lead role in a complex character study. Which role is more prestigious? Oh, and “Hustle & Flow” is a good movie while “Crash” sucks. Which movie would you rather see?
DJay transcends the stereotype. Just as straight people can identify with Ennis in “Brokeback,” white people can identify with DJay in “Hustle & Flow.” His desperation is ours. Some critics have mocked this universality — “the mid-life crisis of a pimp,” they say — but these critics are comfortable people in comfortable jobs who can’t imagine being in their mid-30s and looking around and thinking “How did I end up here?” and rousing themselves for one last stab at something worthwhile before their time runs out.
Which is to say: I wholly identified with DJay, and rooted for him, and marveled at Howard’s quiet performance. DJay marshals his few smarts and fewer connections and what courage he has to not be a pimp. This is negative how?
The man in black
![]() |
Twentieth Century Fox / AP |
The only fault with Phoenix’s performance, really, is that he didn’t quite get Johnny Cash’s singing voice down. A tall (or deep) task.
The journeyman
Don’t get me wrong. David Strathairn was great as Edward R. Murrow, but he only got to play the public Murrow; the movie didn’t really give us a glimpse into the private Murrow. In the movie, Murrow represents this one thing (journalistic integrity), and deviation from this one thing wasn’t part of the script. Which is why the script shouldn’t win for best original screenplay.
![]() |
Warner Independent Pictures / Reuters |
So you could say this was overdue.
The sum up
As I said: All great performances. All great actors.
But who do I think will win? Philip Seymour Hoffman. Who do I want to win? Philip Seymour Hoffman. Who do I think is one of the best actors of his generation? Philip Seymour Hoffman.
Hoffman’s next role, by the way, is again a supporting one. He plays a supervillain trying to destroy Tom Cruise in “Mission: Impossible III.” I’ll be rooting for Hoffman in that one, too.
Erik Lundegaard assumes that Truman Capote’s beautifully written “The Muses are Heard: An Account” is still out-of-print because the publishing industry is full of idiots. Tell him he’s wrong at: .
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM ACADEMY AWARDS |
| Add Academy Awards headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide






