Skip navigation

What can be done to stop predators?


< Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next >

Hansen: The natural reaction after seeing a story like this is to say, "Lock these guys up.  Throw away the key. That's the only way to protect children.”
Dr. Berlin: Well-- I think before I got into this area, I might have had quite the same reaction.  One of the things we've done in this area is we've completely dehumanized these people.  If we look back historically, at one time we looked at alcoholism as though it was only a moral problem.  The alcoholic was the bum in the gutter.

Well, we still have moral values as we should when it comes to alcoholism.  But we also have the Betty Ford Clinic.  We recognize there are legitimate concerns for science and medicine.

When we talk about terms like "sexual predator," "pedophile," "sexual offender," we're talking as though it's only a moral problem.  And God knows they're important moral issues.  But there are also important issues of medical and scientific concern.  How is it that some people are not attracted to people of their own age?  How is it that some people crave sex with children and they're not attracted to other adults?  Given the fact that such people exist and that we can't punish away or legislate those kinds of disorders, what can we learn through science research to help make society safer?  What kinds of treatments can we provide for them?

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

If I may make one final point about treatment-- and I want to do it in the context that it should always be combined with a strong criminal justice approach-- when we see stings such as the one we're seeing here, I ask myself this (a) Does this make it more likely that someone who's sexually disordered who wants help is going to come forward and see it?  (b) Does it give them any idea if they want that help where they can go to get it?  (C) Are they going to feel comfortable that if they do seek help?

And if they're not going to feel that they can come forth and get help, how are we helping to prevent a problem?  We're just having to pick up the pieces after the fact?

Hansen: If a man sees this program and that man has a problem in this area, what should that person do?
Dr. Berlin: There are very few resources available.  We see on television all the time “if you have schizophrenia,” “if you have anorexia nervosa,” “if you have a drug problem,” “if you have an alcohol problem,” we as a society want to help you.  We want to help you before you go out if you're an alcoholic and get in a car and injure an innocent person.

Where do we hear that as a society we want to reach out to people who are struggling and confused and disordered sexually?  Where do they get the message this is where you can go?  We're created a "we versus they" mentality.  And I understand that what they do is offensive.  It's aggravating.  It makes me angry.  But we're not going to solve the problem by pushing it further underground.

Hansen: Is there a place for these men to go to get help?
Dr. Berlin: If someone whose craving sex with children gives into that craving, hurts another person, can destroy their own life in the process.  We have places like the Betty Ford Clinic for alcoholics.  We have places for drug addicts to go to.  There are virtually no places where people who are sexually disordered can go in our society and seek help.  There are young troubled adolescents out there now today as we speak, many that are experiencing abnormal sexual cravings.  They may be very troubled by that.  The last thing they're going to do in our society is raise their hand and ask for assistance.  And the price we pay is that we may see them ten years down the line when they're arrested after the fact, because there was no help available to them before.

Hansen: So you would argue, while you need a strong criminal justice system in place to deal with these guys, until there is a treatment network in place, we could go do this story virtually every week anywhere in the country and get the same results?
Dr. Berlin: Absolutely.  We need both the attorney general and the surgeon general involved with this.  How much research is being done to look at the issue of how some people become sexually disordered?  There are actually people in the Congress and the Senate that say that we shouldn't fund research of that nature as though somehow by looking at what we can do to help these men, we're not caring enough about victims.

My God, prevention is the most important thing when it comes to victims.  And we're only going to learn how to do that by finding out people become sexually disordered, how to intervene before the fact and how for those who want help— that they can have access to that help before they go out and hurt an innocent person.

Hansen: Is this a problem that can be solved with more severe punishment and better legislation? 
Dr. Berlin: The sense that I get is that our society today seems to feel that almost every problem can be solved by enforcing some prior statue more sternly, or by enacting new legislation.  There are other things that have to be looked at.  There's the role of science.  There's the role of research. There's the role of treatment.  There's the role of treatment providers working collaboratively with parole and probation in situations such as this.  There are laws being enacted now in terms of where people who are sexual offenders can live in some states. Whereas other states are beginning to wonder if those laws are helping and are looking towards rescinding them.

Because there's so much emotion tied to this, we really need to get beyond that emotion, to think it through and to try to base public policy on facts that are going to try to lead to effective solutions. 

And if I may just add one final point to that:  Much of public policy today in this area is based on the exception rather than the rule—those horrible cases where there's a kidnapping, a sexual assault and a murder of a young child. That is a fraction of one percent of the big problem.  And yet if we're going to base our public policy on the exception rather than the rule, it begs the question as to whether or not that's going to be the most effective public policy.

Hansen: Some prosecutors would argue that there's nothing that can be done for these men.  That once arrested, once convicted, they should be locked up for the rest of their lives.
Dr. Berlin: Look, if you hear an overzealous therapist saying “We can help all of these men,” that's an extreme statement that is completely out of keeping with reality.  On the other hand, if you hear somebody saying “Once an offender, always an offender,” although that may not be as easily appreciated, that is an equally extreme statement that is not in keeping with reality.

Hansen: But I have to tell you, in this particular investigation, we had numerous repeat offenders and registered sex offenders.
Dr. Berlin: Absolutely.  And to some extent, it's like going to the mortuary and wanting to find out whether or not doctors ever help patients.  Obviously you're going to see the ones that fail.  What concerns me and what concerns me in terms of public perception is that we keep hearing about the failures but hardly ever hear about the successes.

If today, we want to say “Here are ten men who are repeat offenders,” should we not also say “We've gone out and found that today there are these multitude of men who are living safely in the community in a productive way and not hurting anyone”?  Wouldn't that be a more balanced and honest way of presenting the facts to the public?

Hansen: Is that accurate?  Is that happening in some of these groups?  In some of these treatment areas?
Dr. Berlin: The United States Department of Justice, which doesn't have an ax to grind in my opinion, because of much of this new legislation, took a look at the issue of sex offender recidivism.  And I've worked in this area for many years.  And the findings surprised even me because what they found was, as a group, sex offenders have a lower rate of recidivism than people who commit other kinds of serious offenses.  And yet the public perception, most of public policy, the way in which we view this problem today, is based upon exactly the opposite assumption.

Hansen: But we had guys walk into our house who not only had offended before but were registered sex offenders...
Dr. Berlin: Absolutely.  And if we were talking about alcoholics, there would be people who are in treatment who, unfortunately, go back out and drink.  But we don't say to that we shouldn't continue to treat alcoholism.  We don't say to that that no one who has a drinking problem deserves help.  And we certainly don't say to that that everybody who's an alcoholic who's in treatment is almost certainly going to recidivate.

Hansen: But in this case, the stakes are high given the fact that the victim would be a 12 or 13-year-old kid who could be scarred for the rest of their lives.
Dr. Berlin: The stakes are always high.  But let me tell you, and I hope to God I'd never have to make this choice.  But if the choice was between a sexual offender fondling my 12 year old or a drunk driver killing my 12 year old, given that horrible dilemma, it still wouldn't take me much time to figure out which I think is more serious.

Now the point I'm trying to make is not to minimize any of this.  The point I'm trying to make that as a society we've somehow come to the conclusion that the worst possible crime of any sort is anything that has to do with sex.  These are horribly serious offenses.  But they're not the only serious offenses that are out there.  And yet it's the only situation which we say, as a group, “none of these people are deserving of help.” None of these people can be successfully redeemed.

Hansen: What makes you say that this group of people is A) deserving of help and B) can really be helped?
Dr. Berlin: Well, I think what makes me say that is simply the facts.  I didn't know anything about this area before I went into it.  But I've seen many men who, for example, come into treatment as a condition of parole of probation but stay in treatment long beyond when that is required.  85 percent of people in this program have remained in treatment when there was absolutely no mandate that they do so.

I prescribed sex drive lowering medication for well over 100 individuals in the course of my practice as a physician.  A very serious form of treatment.  In all but a handful of cases, those men took that treatment on an entirely voluntary basis.  There was absolutely no mandate from the court or anyone else that they could d so.  Now, again, I don't want to minimize the fact that there are people who do very bad things.  I'm not suggesting that all of these people, by any means, deserve help.  What I am suggesting, though, is that the opposite side of the coin, that “they're all evil people, that none of them deserve help, that there's one glove that fits all,” in my experience, simply is not accurate.

Hansen: Without the Internet, do the vast majority of these men actually show up at a house to try to molest a child?
Dr. Berlin: Well, the Internet is relatively new, so we're trying to learn more about it.  The answer is that there are some men who previously set out relationships with children before there was an Internet who now use the Internet as another way of doing that.  And so that's one group.

There's another group of men who seem to use the Internet simply because they're interested in visual imagery.  They're looking, for example, at child pornography.  For them, that's an end in and of itself.  And they're not necessarily looking to go any further.

And then finally, there are a group of men who seem to have had no prior history whatsoever of trying to seek out sexual relationship with children.  But now with the presence of the Internet presumably playing on some vulnerability are beginning to act in such a fashion.


Sponsored links

Resource guide