Spy leak trial for Scooter Libby set for 2007
Judge delays at request of Libby lawyer, who cited conflict
![]() | I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, former chief of staff for Vice President Dick Cheney, leaves federal court after a hearing in Washington on Friday. |
Gerald Herbert / AP |
MSNBC TV VIDEO |
Trial date for 'Scooter' Libby Feb. 3: Trial date for Vice President Dick Cheney's former Chief of Staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby has been set. MSNBC-TV’s David Shuster reports. MSNBC |
NBC Video: Politics |
Ron Paul on Tea Party principles Congressman Ron Paul talks with Rachel Maddow about the contrast between the Tea Party movement and his more popular and principled conservative, libertarian "Campaign for Liberty" during the 2008 election season. |
Slideshow |
Obama's first year in office Look back at some moments that have characterized the president’s tenure so far. more photos |
Slideshow |
more photos |
WASHINGTON - A federal judge on Friday set former White House aide I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby’s trial date for January 2007, two months after the midterm congressional elections.
The trial for Libby, who faces perjury and obstruction of justice charges, will begin with jury selection Jan. 8, said U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton. Walton said he had hoped to start the trial in September but one of Libby’s lawyers had a scheduling conflict that made an earlier date impossible.
Walton said he does not like “to have a case linger” but had no choice because Libby attorney Ted Wells will be tied up for 10 weeks in another case.
Libby, formerly chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, stopped for coffee and made small talk with reporters as he headed to a conference room on the second floor of the courthouse. Walton scheduled the hearing in part to determine what progress was being made in the case.
Wells said Libby’s defense team was “very happy” with the trial date. It “will permit us the time we need to prepare Mr. Libby’s defense,” he told reporters outside the courthouse.
“The defense will show that Mr. Libby is totally innocent, that he has not done anything wrong,” Wells continued, as Libby silently stood nearby. “And he looks forward to being totally vindicated by a jury.”
Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald did not oppose the date during the hearing, and his team left the courthouse without commenting.
Reporters to be identified
The judge also told the lawyers that he wants them to identify soon the reporters that each side wants to testify at trial to avoid delays while news organizations fight the subpoenas.
So far, Libby’s lawyers have told Walton they want to seek notes and other documents from news organizations. But it was clear from the hearing that both sides expect to seek trial testimony from reporters.
Fitzgerald said both sides should know which reporters they want to subpoena by early spring.
Libby, 55, was indicted late last year on charges that he lied to FBI agents and a federal grand jury about how he learned CIA operative Valerie Plame’s identity and when he subsequently told reporters.
CIA operative Plame’s identity was published in July 2003 by columnist Robert Novak after her husband, former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson, accused the Bush administration of twisting intelligence about Iraq’s efforts to buy uranium “yellowcake” in Niger. The year before, the CIA had sent Wilson to Africa to determine the accuracy of the uranium reports.
Walton did not hear arguments on motions that Libby’s lawyers have filed over disputes they have with Fitzgerald. Instead, the judge set a series of deadlines for additional motions and scheduled future hearings, the first on Feb. 24.
Libby strategy outlined
In only a few filings so far, Libby’s lawyers have revealed a significant part of their strategy.
A key element is their contention that Libby may have been confused when he told FBI agents and the grand jury about his conversations with reporters for NBC, Time and The New York Times. But he didn’t lie, the lawyers plan to argue.
The defense attorneys maintain that Libby believed Plame’s employment by the CIA was common knowledge among reporters. To prove it, they want Walton to let them obtain notes kept by other reporters — besides the three identified in Libby’s indictment — so they can determine when journalists first heard about Plame and from whom.
The timeline of events remains unclear. On Friday, a federal appeals court unsealed eight pages of previously secret grand jury materials which show inconsistencies between Libby’s claims of when he discovered Plame’s identity and when others— including NBC’s Tim Russert and former presidential spokesperson Ari Fleischer— contend he was aware of it.
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM POLITICS |
| Add Politics headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide





