Iran’s intentions as unclear as West’s options 

updated 6:55 p.m. ET Feb. 1, 2006

CAIRO, Egypt - At a decisive moment in the struggle over Iran’s nuclear program, Tehran’s true intentions — and the West’s real options — remain murky. Even such basic questions as “Who calls the shots?” are open to debate. One thing is known: Iran has vast amounts of oil and plenty of ways to retaliate, whatever the world decides to do.

A look at some questions surrounding the crisis:

Q: How close is Iran to making a nuclear bomb?

A: Iran says its nuclear program is purely for generating electricity and that it has no intention of developing nuclear weapons.

The United States disputes that, saying it believes Iran aims for atomic weapons. And Iran’s Jan. 10 decision to restart small-scale uranium enrichment — and its president’s call for Israel to be wiped off the map — have clearly jolted the world.

The International Atomic Energy Agency says a three-year investigation produced no evidence Iran is trying to build atomic arms, but didn’t rule that out either. And U.S. intelligence made public last year suggested Tehran’s scientists do have engineering drafts of a nuclear warhead.

If Iran kicked into high gear on uranium enrichment — something it threatens to do if it is taken before the U.N. Security Council — it could produce nuclear weapons from three to 10 years later, experts estimate.

Q: What will happen Thursday and Friday?

A: The board of the IAEA is expected to report Iran to the U.N. Security Council, essentially asking it to take on international oversight of Tehran’s nuclear program. Russia and China agreed last week on the need for that — a victory for the United States.

Q: What happens after that?

A: Reporting Iran to the Security Council would be just the start of a long process that could end in sanctions against Tehran. But nothing is likely to happen fast.

For starters, the most powerful members of the U.N. have agreed that the Security Council should wait until March to take up Iran’s case. The delay could give Iran time to moderate its position, or agree to let Russia perform nuclear enrichment work on its behalf. Or, it could just mean continued stalemate.

Q: If Iran doesn’t back down, will Security Council sanctions be the end result?

A: It seems unlikely. China and Russia generally oppose using the council to impose sanctions, and both are trading partners with Iran. They would probably try to block such a move.

U.S. officials have also said they want to take a gradual approach — possibly starting with a council statement of concern or reprimand, and only seeking a legally binding resolution that could include sanctions as a last resort.

If sanctions are imposed, they could be tough to enforce, could cripple Iran’s economy and damage its standard of living — and almost certainly would force up world oil prices.

MORE FROM MIDEAST & N. AFRICA

Mideast & N. Africa Section Front

Iran: U.N. station near border is for spying   Palestinians fake cancer to flee blockaded Gaza Palestinian files $110M libel suit over ‘Bruno’ Iraq shakes up security after bombings Ukraine OK’s $2.5 billion arms deal with Iraq Man, dog thought dead survive Baghdad blast Iran: Students, militia clash for 2nd day Mideast & N. Africa Section Front   Add Mideast & N. Africa headlines to your news reader: