Viewers can relate to Globes TV categories
Nominees and winners are shows people actually watch
![]() | Can Wentworth Miller's inmate-with-a-secret on "Prison Break" edge out Patrick Dempsey's Dr. McDreamy from "Grey's Anatomy"? |
C. Hodes / AP |
Slide show |
Pick up the paper Tuesday morning and you’ll read all about the big winner at the previous night’s Golden Globes. The headlines will scream about “Brokeback Mountain” or Woody Allen’s “Match Point” but no matter who comes out on top, most of the nation won’t relate.
Call “Lost” the evening’s champ and a collective “Way to go!” will be heard throughout the land.
Yeah, the Globes are all about the movies, as the ceremony unofficially kicks off the Academy Awards race and its ramifications determine who are the favorites to take home Oscars. But especially this year, when so many of the movies are indies which much of the filmgoing public have never seen — where’s “King Kong” in all this? — the Globes’ connection to the common folk are in its TV categories.
Take Fox’s brilliant “Arrested Development” a show that’s about to be canceled due to low ratings. Over 4 million people watch a single episode — and that’s considered abysmal. George Clooney’s political drama “Good Night, and Good Luck” is a big success and won’t even get close to 1 million total viewers when its run is over. The film will probably be in multiplexes for close to six months.
So while the studios, critics and publicists may get all teary-eyed about exalting new kings of the big screen, for the average consumer it’s the TV nominees that one can judge for themselves who deserves to win and lose.
And if history dictates, they’ll be plenty of new blood for viewers to get all gushy about.
Splashy debuts rewarded
When it comes to their TV choices, the Globes — a group called the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, which consists of about 95 members who live in the U.S. but write for foreign publications — are all about the new and the bold.
If you’re a show that wants Globes recognition, you better make a splashy debut or pretty much forget about it. Of this years five best dramas, four are freshman series — “Grey’s Anatomy” (though currently in season No. 2, it debuted in midseason in 2005 and is first-time Globes eligible), “Commander in Chief,” “Prison Break” and “Rome” — and the only returning program is “Lost,” which demands a nomination due to its watercooler status. On the comedy side, “Everybody Hates Chris,” “My Name Is Earl” and “Weeds” are the newcomers.
Not only did “Housewives” and Teri Hatcher win in their first year but so did Ian McShane (“Deadwood”), Anthony LaPaglia (“Without a Trace”), Tony Shalhoub (“Monk”), Kiefer Sutherland (“24), Jennifer Garner (“Alias”) and Michael Chiklis (“The Shield”).
Fighting for TV awards recognition vs. big brother Emmy, the Globes have capitalized on the hot and edgy. The group may be way out there sometimes with its picks — some people still gripe about Keri Russell winning best actress for “Felicity” in 1999, but her Ben vs. Noel dilemma was awards-worthy in my book. But isn’t that kind of debate better than wildly overrated William Shatner winning an Emmy again in the mind-numbingly dull “Boston Legal”?
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM GOLDEN GLOBES |
| Add Golden Globes headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide



