After ‘King Kong,’ what's left?

It seems almost certain that “King Kong” will enjoy the same critical adulation and blockbuster popular success as the “Lord Of The Rings” trilogy, which means that Kong isn’t the only 10-ton gorilla around. With four massive successes in a row, director Peter Jackson is an enviable position as an artist, having gained enough clout that he could choose just about anything he dreamed of for his next film and he’d find a studio that would let him make it. (“A dramatic adaptation of the Sears catalog, Mr. Jackson? Brilliant!”)

So what should that next movie be?

Well, he’s already got a couple slated for 2007, both of which seem well-chosen — he’ll take a break from the gigantic scope of his recent films for a return to a smaller scale by directing the movie version of Alice Sebold’s hauntingly beautiful novel “The Lovely Bones.” And he’s keeping his foot in the door of the big action picture by serving as executive producer of “Halo,” based on the popular video game.

But even if those movies should fall through, Jackson is in no danger of running out of source material that would benefit from his particular skills as a filmmaker — a penchant for the epic that doesn’t lose sight of the personal, a rare facility with action scenes, and an ability to anchor high-flown fantasy and horror elements with realism. Here are a few of our humble suggestions.

Feeling the love
“Heavenly Creatures” showed that Jackson has little trouble depicting a highly dysfunctional love affair in a way that’s sympathetic to the characters yet still acknowledges its dark and unpleasant side, and the same dynamic powers the relationship between the giant ape and Naomi Watts’ character in “Kong.” He’d be a natural to take on the granddaddy of all doomed Gothic romances, Emily Brontë’s “Wuthering Heights.”

Slideshow   Celebrity sightings Big-screen sizzle, top models, Alanis and more more photos

Hopping across the Atlantic in search of material, we come across an eldritch source of inspiration: New England horror writer H.P. Lovecraft, whose influential body of work has, by and large, been either ignored or served badly by moviemakers. Though Lovecraft’s ideas have inspired dozens of films, including such classics as John Carpenter’s “The Thing,” faithful and well-made adaptations of the stories themselves are few — Stuart Gordon’s “Re-Animator” and “Dagon” among them.

Jackson’s roots in the genre, including the classic zombie satire “Dead/Alive,” make him more than qualified. Perhaps the best option would be “The Dunwich Horror,” one of Lovecraft’s most well-known short stories, which has a plot that seems particularly cinematic. Though a movie of “Dunwich” was made in 1970, the original story was made almost unrecognizable, with trendy psychedelic nonsense replacing the admittedly outlandish and over-the-top, but truly scary, scenario.

Call the Doctor
The venerable British sci-fi series “Doctor Who” is in good hands now on the small screen, brought back to life in a cheekily well-written, Buffyesque format by “Queer As Folk” creator Russell T. Davies. But nobody’s made a feature-length film spinoff of the series since Peter Cushing starred in two forgettable “Doctor Who” movies in the mid-1960s.

Jackson would find an excellent match for his talents in “Who’s” match of slam-bang action, creepy horror and thought-provoking science fiction. The villains of this hypothetical film would almost certainly have to be the tank-like Daleks simply because they’re The Doctor’s most popular foes, but we’d love to see what Jackson would do with such eerie aliens as the fungoid Zygons, the amoeba-like Rutan, or the reptilian Silurians and Sea Devils.

There’s plenty of other forgotten or underappreciated science fiction that would fit Jackson. Like “Doctor Who,” lots of them are British — we’d be intrigued to see his take on the 1950s “Quatermass” TV serials and the 1962 monster-chiller “Day Of The Triffids.”

The novels of H.G. Wells are also worth a look. “War Of The Worlds,” “The Time Machine” and “The Island Of Dr. Moreau” have all been filmed recently enough to be effectively off-limits, even if Jackson would probably do a better job. “The Invisible Man” has also been brought to the screen in various incarnations many times, but it’d be interesting to see Jackson update the definitive 1933 Claude Rains version — made the same year as the original “Kong.”

Even better, though, would be if Jackson rescued a couple of decent Wells stories about giant marauding animals from their schlocky 1970s adaptations, “Food Of The Gods” and “Empire Of The Ants,” currently known mainly as the source of the infamous “Simpsons” line: “I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords.”

MORE FROM MOVIES

Movies Section Front

Could 2010 be the year Oscar goes geek?   ‘Nine’ disappoints in return to big screen Freeman, Eastwood team up for ‘Invictus’ Hollywood depicts shining S. African moment ‘Invictus’ dripping with inspiration Miss. girl excited about role in ‘Princess’ Newsweek video: Carrie Fisher on 'Star Wars,' more ‘The Lovely Bones’ trades soul for spectacle Gervais: Stars in for a teasing at Golden Globes De Niro shines in ‘Everybody’s Fine’ Movies Section Front   Add Movies headlines to your news reader: